: But theres a second problem with this claim. However, I suspect that the opposition to gay marriage would like to appropriate marriage equality as a way of saying that extending equal civil rights to gays somehow lessens their monopoly rights to (traditional) marriage. David Shankbone 21:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Is it possible that we can archive this? Mish ( talk ) 20:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC) I agree with Mish on this: "polygamy" falls under a number of general categories already discussed in the intro, such as tradition and religion. We behave as though its all up to us, and that God has no role whatsoever to play in this.
Second half seems to describe the fear of special rights being attributed to the civil status of gay couples, thus providing 'special' rights currently not endorsed to heterosexual relationships - Historyguy1965 ( talk ) 01:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC) How many times have you heard. Dosbears ( talk ) 02:09, (UTC) Intro is biased The intro lists more specific and more fleshed out arguments in favor of gay marriage without giving the same level of depth to the opposing arguments (even including homophobia as a reason - I wonder.
The Advantages in Arranged Marriages,
Remember we're dealing with various cultures and dialects. A terminology section detailing who uses which terms and how they may be considered npov would be best. And it's not even a matter of "religious liberties" either. To begin with, it has become clear that ptsd is not only a disorder, which is fear-based as child Play Study and Documentation spelt out in DSM-III and DSM-IV. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. As such, the whole sentence is unsupported, and I'm deleting. However, there is limited information available on understanding the survival lifestyle of a spouse readjusting with a soldier member that is returning from a threatening environment to a non-threatening environment. .