larger populations, this takes the form of representative democracy, where decisions are made by elected individuals on behalf of their constituents. Whether or not to spread democracy in the first place is a personalview, but there is no reason why Western countries cannot use thepower of their economies and benefits of membership ininternational treaties to push Middle Eastern states in the rightdirections. That was one of the ostensible goals. Thus, it should have been clear from the outset that neither the public in America nor the public in the Middle East would see benefits that justified the course. By increasing the number of voters, especially those who had been discriminated against, democracy was enhanced. Democracy is a political concept. Democracy is important because it gives the right to the people to express their views or opinions. If Iraq is an example of the democratic change one can expect, who, anywhere, would want it? Even today in many cases ex-felons ( even after having served time in the prisons ) are not eligible to Vote and may have travel privileges curtailed. The second Islam was an actual Empire or Islamic State which expanded through warfare and conquest.
It distinguishes between democratic procedures of government and the political philosophy of liberalism, but also explains how the two are closely linked.
The second section outlines the main arguments for why spreading democracy benefits the inhabitants of newly democratizing states.
Rather than providing a democratic space in which democratic values and participation could be fostered, the CGs in many instances acted to maintain.
For further information on the issues raised in this paper, please email.
How and why has multiparty democracy spread.
Itencouraged members of the League (180 city-states) to adopt ademocratic form of government after the Persian Empire made peacein 449 BCE, in some cases forcing it upon them, as this wascompatible with its own form of government and eased the Leaguemembers resistance when Athens turned. This is for one and only one reason. .
The Athenian Democracy was the "truest" democracy known today. But there is more about the troubling dynamics in places like Egypt and Saudi Arabia where something else worked against the spread of democracy. You don't get to vote or have a say in any of the big choices your government makes. But on the other hand, the defined problem concerns what is intended by the adjective. Most could not resist America's requests, but in the process they felt even more insecure as their public grew angry, and they unleashed the security services to prevent revoltseven as they held limited elections. Spreading democracy as a goal of American foreign policy is not new. The system as set up in numerous MiddleEastern countries, such as Libya and Iraq is that each person hassole loyalty to his tribal leader and not to a national government. France became a democracy in 1789 at the start of the French Revolution, but in 1799 they appointed Napolean Bonaparte as their emperor. Further, our refusal to negotiate directly with organizations like Hamas or governments like North Korea is often seen as a sign of American arrogance and stubborness.